BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, CUTTACK — C.A. No. 2048/2008

Case under Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010033982007

Filing Date

01-Feb-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 2048/2008

Diary Number

3398/2007

Order Date

25-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

    Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, CUTTACK

    Adv. KIRTI RENU MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 15-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Feb-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2048/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside all proceedings initiated by the Sales Tax Authorities and remitted the matter for reassessment. The Court clarified that electromagnetic waves and radio frequencies cannot be taxed as "goods" under sales tax law; only handsets and equipment supplied by the telecom service provider constitute taxable goods. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute sales tax based on rental charges and equipment costs only, excluding service-related charges. Next Steps: The Assessing Authority was granted liberty to re-compute and raise fresh demand in accordance with the corrected legal framework established by the Court's judgment, decided July 25, 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case