STATE OF HARYANA . vs MANOHAR LAL . — C.A. No. 5480 - 5499/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010032932005

DISPOSED

Filing Date

10-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 5480 - 5499/2009

Diary Number

3293/2005

Order Date

29-Oct-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Data as of 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF HARYANA .

Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

MANOHAR LAL .

Adv. R. C. KAUSHIK PREM MALHOTRA

Orders

20-Sep-2013 ROP
30-Jul-2013 ROP
17-Jan-2013 ROP
08-Oct-2012 ROP
22-Jan-2010 ROP
24-Jul-2009 ROP
24-Jul-2009 ROP
09-Jul-2009 ROP
16-Jan-2009 ROP
22-Aug-2008 ROP
21-Feb-2008 ROP
13-Dec-2007 ROP
04-Dec-2007 ROP
24-Sep-2007 ROP
19-Sep-2007 ROP
03-Aug-2007 ROP
01-Dec-2006 ROP
15-Sep-2006 ROP
07-Jul-2006 ROP
17-Apr-2006 ROP
24-Feb-2006 ROP
13-Jan-2006 ROP
21-Jul-2005 ROP
21-Jul-2005 ROP
19-Jul-2005 ROP
04-Apr-2005 ROP
04-Apr-2005 ROP
07-Mar-2005 ROP
04-Mar-2005 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Haryana v. Manohar Lal (C.A. No. 005480-005499/2009) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Haryana and set aside the High Court's orders. The Court held that work-charge service cannot be counted as regular service for purposes of the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. Work-charge employees are engaged temporarily for specific projects without regular recruitment procedures, making their service fundamentally different from regular service. The Court dismissed the respondents' writ petitions claiming benefits under ACP scales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case