STATE OF HARYANA . vs RAJBIR . — C.A. No. 5460 - 5479/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010032912005
Filing Date
10-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5460 - 5479/2009
Diary Number
3291/2005
Order Date
29-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJBIR .
Adv. MITTER & MITTER CO. PREM MALHOTRA KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
22-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
14-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5460 - 5479/2009
Summary of C.A. No. 005460-005479/2009 The Supreme Court held that work-charge service cannot be treated as regular service for purposes of the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. The Court set aside High Court orders that had directed the State to count work-charge service toward ACP scale eligibility, emphasizing that "regular service" requires recruitment through prescribed procedures with proper selection, distinguishing it fundamentally from work-charge employment which is temporary and project-based. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts