ALLAHABAD DEVT.AUTH. . vs PANKAJ SHUKLA — C.A. No. 8809/2017
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010032472011
Filing Date
27-Jan-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 8809/2017
Diary Number
3247/2011
Order Date
10-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALLAHABAD DEVT.AUTH. .
Adv. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANKAJ SHUKLA
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI ABHISTH KUMAR[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jul-2017
Not Taken Up
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
15-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8809/2017
Summary: The Supreme Court allowed Allahabad Development Authority's appeal, setting aside the High Court's order that had directed execution of a sale deed for Rs. 17,92,000 against an allotment letter value of Rs. 27,84,000. Finding no established discrimination and rejecting the High Court's reliance on a non-precedential order, the Court held respondent Pankaj Shukla liable to pay the balance amount (Rs. 9,92,000) within twelve weeks, after which the Authority must execute the sale deed. Any eligible rebate for prompt payment under applicable rules would be credited against this balance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts