PANCHAYAT SAMITI, DABWALI TJHRU BLOCK DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT OFFICER vs OM PARKASH — C.A. No. 4687/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010032272004
Filing Date
11-Feb-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 4687/2009
Diary Number
3227/2004
Order Date
05-Dec-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Data as of 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANCHAYAT SAMITI, DABWALI TJHRU BLOCK DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT OFFICER
Adv. VIJAY K. MEHTA
Respondent(s)
OM PARKASH
Adv. S. R. SETIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
After Week/Month/Vacation
Ordinary
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-Dec-2017 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 15-Nov-2017 | Ordinary |
| 12-Sep-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 30-Aug-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 29-Aug-2017 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
Orders
Summary of C.A. No. 004687/2009: Panchayat Samiti, Dabwali v. Om Parkash The Supreme Court allowed the Panchayat's appeal and restored the First Appellate Court's judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for restoration of possession and removal of a boundary wall. The Court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove their ownership title to the disputed land (6 canals 8 marlas in Survey No. 679/1), as their vendors had no alienable interest remaining after prior sales to third parties. The Court upheld the 1969 acquisition map (Exhibit D-1) as authentic, rejecting the High Court's reliance on a 1976 letter suggesting forgery. Without proven title, the plaintiffs could not obtain injunctive relief against the Panchayat's construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts