DANAMMA @ SUMAN SURPUR vs AMAR — C.A. No. 188 - 189/2018
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010031862013
Filing Date
28-Jan-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 188 - 189/2018
Diary Number
3186/2013
Order Date
01-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2018 INSC 84
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DANAMMA @ SUMAN SURPUR
Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMAR
Adv. H. CHANDRA SEKHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2018
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
10-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 188 - 189/2018
Case Summary: Danamma @ Suman Surpur v. Amar (C.A. 188-189/2018) The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' (two daughters') appeal, ruling they are entitled to equal coparcenary shares in joint family property under the 2005 Hindu Succession Act Amendment. The Court directed the trial court to redraw the partition decree, granting each daughter a 1/5th share (same as sons), with the plaintiff's share reduced to 1/25th accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts