GOVINDASWAMY vs STATE REP.BY R.D.O. . — Crl.A. No. 135 - 136/2004

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010031532003

Filing Date

10-Feb-2003

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 135 - 136/2004

Diary Number

3153/2003

Order Date

08-Feb-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDASWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE REP.BY R.D.O. .

    Adv. S. THANANJAYAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 13-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 28-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 17-Apr-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Feb-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 135 - 136/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Govindaswamy v. State Rep. by R.D.O. (Crl.A. 135-136/2004) Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the appeals on February 8, 2011, reducing appellant Govindaswamy's sentence from life imprisonment to ten years rigorous imprisonment for offences under IPC Section 376(2g). The Court upheld the conviction but applied the sentencing limitation principle based on the trial judge's jurisdictional authority. Basis: As a co-accused, Govindaswamy benefited from an earlier Supreme Court order (in Crl.A. 256-257/2003, dated 21/2/2003) that had reduced sentences to ten years, noting the Assistant Sessions Judge could only lawfully convict for that duration under CrPC Sections 386 and 28. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case