JABAR LAL vs KANMAL — C.A. No. 5575/2000

The Supreme Court allowed Jabar Lal's eviction appeal against tenant Kan Mal, holding that no legal notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is required before filing an eviction petition. The Court rejected the argument that printed conditions on rent receipts constitute a binding agreement requiring one month's advance notice, ruling that lease terms must result from conscious agreement between parties. The case was remitted to the trial court to decide whether the landlord actually gave oral notice to vacate as claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.