VENKATESHA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 176/2014

Case under 1501Two-criminal Law : Offences Against Women, Including Sexual Offences, Harassment, Domestic Violence, Dowry, Trafficking Etc.(cases Where Sentence Upto 2 Years Imprisonment Is Imposed Including Fine Only.) Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010030552013

Filing Date

28-Jan-2013

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 176/2014

Diary Number

3055/2013

Order Date

09-Jan-2025

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2025 INSC 103

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1501TWO-Criminal Law : Offences against women, including sexual offences, harassment, domestic violence, dowry, trafficking etc.(Cases where sentence upto 2 years imprisonment is imposed including fine only.) Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VENKATESHA

    Adv. SUDHA GUPTA SUDHA GUPTA[P-2] [Pr] SUDHA GUPTA[P-3] [Pr] SUDHA GUPTA[P-4] [Pr]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA SECRETARY

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jan-2025

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Jan-2025

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih

  4. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 176/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Venkatesha & Ors. v. State of Karnataka Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the High Court's judgment dated December 14, 2011. The convictions under Section 363 IPC were set aside. The appellants' bail bonds were discharged. Key Reasoning: The Court found the conviction defective on two grounds: (1) the victim was 19 years old at the time of the alleged 1997 abduction, making Sections 361 and 363 IPC inapplicable (which require victims under 18 years for females), and (2) an 8-year gap between incident and 2005 trial, combined with no identification parade and the victim not knowing the co-accused, cast serious doubt on witness identification and prosecution credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case