UMESH GAUTAM vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — C.A. No. 3313/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010029012009
Filing Date
30-Jan-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 3313/2010
Diary Number
2901/2009
Order Date
24-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH GAUTAM
Adv. S. MAHENDRAN S. MAHENDRAN[P-2]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. ANUVRAT SHARMA ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-2] ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-3] ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-4] ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-5]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
23-Aug-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
-
22-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3313/2010
Summary: Civil Appeal No. 3313/2010 The Supreme Court bench of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit heard the appeal filed by Umesh Gautam & Anr. against the State of U.P. on August 24, 2017. The Court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it. All pending applications were also disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts