U.T. CHANDIGARH(CHANDIGARH ADMN.) . vs RAM KARAN . — C.A. No. 6795/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010027812005

Filing Date

03-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 6795/2009

Diary Number

2781/2005

Order Date

03-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U.T. CHANDIGARH(CHANDIGARH ADMN.) .

    Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM KARAN .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  5. 17-Dec-2013
  6. 30-Sep-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 30-Sep-2013
  8. 26-Aug-2013
  9. 29-Jul-2013
  10. 10-May-2013
  11. 09-Apr-2013
  12. 08-Mar-2013
  13. 03-Dec-2012
  14. 06-Jul-2012
  15. 28-Nov-2011
  16. 11-Oct-2011
  17. 17-Aug-2011
  18. 06-May-2011
  19. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Mar-2009
  22. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Feb-2009
  24. 18-Feb-2009
  25. 11-Feb-2009
  26. 05-Feb-2009
  27. 14-Jan-2009
  28. 12-Dec-2008
  29. 28-Nov-2008
  30. 16-Oct-2008
  31. 25-Sep-2008
  32. 03-Sep-2008
  33. 21-Aug-2008
  34. 30-Jul-2008
  35. 15-Jul-2008
  36. 10-Jul-2008
  37. 13-May-2008
  38. 12-May-2008
  39. 23-Apr-2008
  40. 22-Apr-2008
  41. 03-Apr-2008
  42. 28-Mar-2008
  43. 13-Mar-2008
  44. 25-Feb-2008
  45. 08-Feb-2008
  46. 07-Feb-2008
  47. 23-Jan-2008
  48. 28-Nov-2007
  49. 15-Nov-2007
  50. 22-Oct-2007
  51. 09-Oct-2007
  52. 05-Oct-2007
  53. 24-Sep-2007
  54. 23-Aug-2007
  55. 22-Aug-2007
  56. 18-May-2007
  57. 18-May-2007
  58. 18-May-2007
  59. 16-May-2007
  60. 01-May-2007
  61. 29-Mar-2007
  62. 20-Feb-2007
  63. 20-Feb-2007
  64. 20-Feb-2007
  65. 07-Feb-2007
  66. 19-Jan-2007
  67. 15-Jan-2007
  68. 29-Nov-2006
  69. 29-Nov-2006
  70. 09-Nov-2006
  71. 12-Oct-2006
  72. 12-Oct-2006
  73. 12-Oct-2006
  74. 11-Oct-2006
  75. 31-Aug-2006
  76. 31-Aug-2006
  77. 31-Aug-2006
  78. 31-Aug-2006
  79. 27-Jul-2006
  80. 27-Jul-2006
  81. 26-Jul-2006
  82. 26-Jul-2006
  83. 13-Jul-2006
  84. 13-Jul-2006
  85. 13-Jul-2006
  86. 13-Jul-2006
  87. 06-Jul-2006
  88. 02-Jan-2006
  89. 29-Aug-2005
  90. 25-Jul-2005
  91. 25-Jul-2005
  92. 25-Jul-2005
  93. 25-Jul-2005
  94. 25-Jul-2005
  95. 25-Jul-2005
  96. 25-Jul-2005
  97. 25-Jul-2005
  98. 09-May-2005
  99. 09-May-2005
  100. 09-May-2005
  101. 09-May-2005
  102. 09-May-2005
  103. 09-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 09-May-2005
  105. 09-May-2005
  106. 09-May-2005
  107. 07-Mar-2005
  108. 28-Feb-2005
  109. 03-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6795/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 006795/2009 U.T. Chandigarh v. Ram Karan (Decided 3 April 2014) The Supreme Court dismissed Chandigarh Administration's appeals challenging the High Court's order to regularize casual/daily-wage workers employed in menial positions (coolies, malies, beldars) for 25+ years. The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's directive to regularize services and pay pension/family pension benefits, directing appellants to expedite regularization and provide full salary with dearness allowance and pensionary benefits under CPWD Work Charged Establishment Manual. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case