STATE OF KERALA PUBLICK PROSECUTOR vs KURIACHAN JOSEPH @ KURIACHAN — Crl.A. No. 842/2009

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010027682005

Filing Date

03-Feb-2005

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 842/2009

Diary Number

2768/2005

Order Date

13-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KERALA PUBLICK PROSECUTOR

    Adv. C. K. SASI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KURIACHAN JOSEPH @ KURIACHAN

    Adv. M. P. VINOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  4. 21-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 30-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 15-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 17-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 20-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 25-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 842/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Kerala v. Kuriachan Joseph (Crl.A. No. 842/2009) The Supreme Court dismissed Kerala's appeal against Kuriachan Joseph on July 13, 2017. The High Court had reversed the trial court's culpable homicide conviction, finding Joseph acted within his right of private defence when he fatally stabbed the deceased with a knife after the deceased attacked him with a pint bottle. The Court upheld the High Court's factual findings that Joseph did not exceed lawful self-defence and was not acting brutally or cruelly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case