BIMAL KISHORE PALIWAL . vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX — C.A. No. 3836/2011

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010026872006

Filing Date

27-Jan-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 3836/2011

Diary Number

2687/2006

Order Date

13-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 1041

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMAL KISHORE PALIWAL .

    Adv. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR ANIL KATIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Oct-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 21-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Sep-2015
  12. 10-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  13. 10-Sep-2015
  14. 06-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Mar-2011
  21. 03-Dec-2010
  22. 25-Oct-2010
  23. 28-Sep-2010
  24. 01-Sep-2010
  25. 03-Aug-2010
  26. 14-Aug-2006
  27. 31-Jul-2006
  28. 10-Jul-2006
  29. 06-Mar-2006
  30. 24-Feb-2006
  31. 27-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3836/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003836 / 2011: Bimal Kishore Paliwal v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals on October 13, 2017, upholding the High Court's decision and the land-and-building valuation method for Alpana Cinema. Key Issue: Whether the Alpana Cinema (a partnership asset owned by M/s G.D. & Sons) should be valued using the income capitalization method or the land-and-building method under the Wealth Tax Act for assessment years 1970-75. Court's Ruling: The Court held that Section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act is discretionary/enabling—not mandatory. The Wealth Tax Officer validly chose to refer the property to a Departmental Valuer for land-and-building valuation rather than apply income capitalization. The High Court correctly rejected the ITAT's income capitalization approach, noting that using it would produce negative valuations when losses occurred, contradicting legislative intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case