BIMAL KISHORE PALIWAL . vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX — C.A. No. 3836/2011
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010026872006
Filing Date
27-Jan-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 3836/2011
Diary Number
2687/2006
Order Date
13-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 1041
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIMAL KISHORE PALIWAL .
Adv. KAMLENDRA MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR ANIL KATIYAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
10-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
10-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
03-Dec-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Oct-2010
ROPView PDF
-
28-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
01-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
14-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
31-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
06-Mar-2006
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jan-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3836/2011
Summary of C.A. No. 003836 / 2011: Bimal Kishore Paliwal v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals on October 13, 2017, upholding the High Court's decision and the land-and-building valuation method for Alpana Cinema. Key Issue: Whether the Alpana Cinema (a partnership asset owned by M/s G.D. & Sons) should be valued using the income capitalization method or the land-and-building method under the Wealth Tax Act for assessment years 1970-75. Court's Ruling: The Court held that Section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act is discretionary/enabling—not mandatory. The Wealth Tax Officer validly chose to refer the property to a Departmental Valuer for land-and-building valuation rather than apply income capitalization. The High Court correctly rejected the ITAT's income capitalization approach, noting that using it would produce negative valuations when losses occurred, contradicting legislative intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts