C.I.T. -II vs JAYPEE INFRA VENTURES (A PRIVATE COMPANY WITH UNLIMITED LIABILITY) THR. ITS MANAGER — C.A. No. 8968/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010026612013
Filing Date
23-Jan-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 8968/2014
Diary Number
2661/2013
Order Date
15-Feb-2022
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.I.T. -II
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYPEE INFRA VENTURES (A PRIVATE COMPANY WITH UNLIMITED LIABILITY) THR. ITS MANAGER
Adv. KAVITA JHA (Designated as Senior Advocate)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Feb-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
09-Feb-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari
-
23-Nov-2017
ROPView PDF
-
23-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2017
ROPView PDF
-
27-Mar-2017
ROPView PDF
-
09-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Nov-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Nov-2016
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
27-Sep-2016
ROPView PDF
-
26-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
16-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
16-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
15-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
01-Jul-2014
ROPView PDF
-
06-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8968/2014
-
10-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
On 23-11-2017, the Supreme Court Registrar heard Civil Appeal No. 8968/2014 between C.I.T.-II and Jaypee Infra Ventures. The Court noted that the respondent was duly represented and that parties had failed to file the required Statements of Case within the stipulated time, though ad valorem court fee had been paid. The Registry was directed to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts