NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs PATIBANDLA SANTHA SUGUNA . — SLP(C) No. 4144 - 4149/2003
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010026502003
Filing Date
04-Feb-2003
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 4144 - 4149/2003
Diary Number
2650/2003
Order Date
29-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Respondent(s)
-
1.PATIBANDLA SANTHA SUGUNA .
Adv. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU D. BHARATHI REDDY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
21-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2003
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 4144 - 4149/2003
Case Summary: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Patibandla Santha Suguna Outcome: On 29 October 2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions (SLP Nos. 4144-4149/2003 and related petitions) filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the High Court of A.P.'s judgment dated 18 September 2002. The Court declined to entertain the petitions citing the smallness of the amount involved. Key Direction: Although dismissing the petitions on this ground, the Court kept the question of law raised open to be agitated in an appropriate case with a larger amount at stake. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts