SHAILESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT — Crl.A. No. 1884/2013
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010026462012
Filing Date
20-Jan-2012
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1884/2013
Diary Number
2646/2012
Order Date
28-Aug-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAILESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL
Adv. NIKHIL GOEL (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-2] NIKHIL GOEL (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] ASHUTOSH GHADE[P-1] ASHUTOSH GHADE[P-2]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] SWATI GHILDIYAL [R-1] SWATI GHILDIYAL [R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Aug-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2024
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
08-Dec-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court & Building)
-
07-Nov-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court & Building)
-
12-Sep-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court & Building)
-
25-Jul-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court & Building)
-
03-May-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court & Building)
-
17-Mar-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Registrar (Jud. Listing)
-
10-Nov-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka
-
14-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar
-
09-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar
-
15-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-V)
-
03-May-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
20-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
07-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
29-Oct-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
05-Sep-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-IV)
-
19-Jul-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
05-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2018
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
03-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
04-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
17-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1884/2013
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 001884/2013 Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed both criminal appeals and quashed FIR No. I-405/2002 (registered under Section 498-A IPC for dowry harassment), the charge-sheet, and all subsequent proceedings. The Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to terminate the long-standing dispute between private parties. Key Facts: The FIR was registered in 2002 against the appellants (parents-in-law and husband). The complainant and husband obtained divorce by mutual consent in 2004, the complainant has since remarried and had children, and both parties now reside abroad. The complainant did not participate in the appeal proceedings despite service of notice. Legal Principle: The Court clarified that High Courts retain power to quash FIRs even after charge-sheets are filed, provided the allegations are vague/general and continuation would constitute abuse of process given the case's peculiar circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts