GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI vs JUDGE, DESIGNATED COURT II — Crl.A. No. 250/1996
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010025781995
Filing Date
17-Feb-1995
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 250/1996
Diary Number
2578/1995
Order Date
20-Feb-1996
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.JUDGE, DESIGNATED COURT II
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Feb-1996
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-1995
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 250/1996
Summary of Crl.A. No. 250/1996 The Supreme Court held that while Review Committees may recommend TADA charge withdrawals, courts cannot approve withdrawals mechanistically based solely on administrative recommendations. Public Prosecutors must independently satisfy themselves that withdrawal serves justice under Section 321 CrPC, and courts must give due weight to reasoned government recommendations unless mala fide or manifestly arbitrary. Fresh applications must be reconsidered by Designated Courts on substantive legal grounds, not mere committee directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts