GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI vs JUDGE, DESIGNATED COURT II — Crl.A. No. 250/1996

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010025781995

Filing Date

17-Feb-1995

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 250/1996

Diary Number

2578/1995

Order Date

20-Feb-1996

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVT. OF N.C.T. DELHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUDGE, DESIGNATED COURT II

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Feb-1996

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Feb-1995

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 250/1996

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 250/1996 The Supreme Court held that while Review Committees may recommend TADA charge withdrawals, courts cannot approve withdrawals mechanistically based solely on administrative recommendations. Public Prosecutors must independently satisfy themselves that withdrawal serves justice under Section 321 CrPC, and courts must give due weight to reasoned government recommendations unless mala fide or manifestly arbitrary. Fresh applications must be reconsidered by Designated Courts on substantive legal grounds, not mere committee directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case