CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION vs KARTAR CHAND . — C.A. No. 6789/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010025302005

Filing Date

01-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 6789/2009

Diary Number

2530/2005

Order Date

03-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION

    Adv. KAMINI JAISWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTAR CHAND .

    Adv. A. P. MOHANTY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  5. 17-Dec-2013
  6. 30-Sep-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  7. 30-Sep-2013
  8. 26-Aug-2013
  9. 29-Jul-2013
  10. 10-May-2013
  11. 09-Apr-2013
  12. 08-Mar-2013
  13. 03-Dec-2012
  14. 06-Jul-2012
  15. 28-Nov-2011
  16. 11-Oct-2011
  17. 17-Aug-2011
  18. 06-May-2011
  19. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Mar-2009
  22. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Feb-2009
  24. 18-Feb-2009
  25. 11-Feb-2009
  26. 05-Feb-2009
  27. 14-Jan-2009
  28. 12-Dec-2008
  29. 28-Nov-2008
  30. 16-Oct-2008
  31. 25-Sep-2008
  32. 03-Sep-2008
  33. 21-Aug-2008
  34. 30-Jul-2008
  35. 15-Jul-2008
  36. 10-Jul-2008
  37. 13-May-2008
  38. 12-May-2008
  39. 23-Apr-2008
  40. 22-Apr-2008
  41. 03-Apr-2008
  42. 28-Mar-2008
  43. 13-Mar-2008
  44. 25-Feb-2008
  45. 08-Feb-2008
  46. 07-Feb-2008
  47. 23-Jan-2008
  48. 28-Nov-2007
  49. 15-Nov-2007
  50. 22-Oct-2007
  51. 09-Oct-2007
  52. 05-Oct-2007
  53. 24-Sep-2007
  54. 23-Aug-2007
  55. 22-Aug-2007
  56. 18-May-2007
  57. 18-May-2007
  58. 18-May-2007
  59. 16-May-2007
  60. 01-May-2007
  61. 29-Mar-2007
  62. 20-Feb-2007
  63. 20-Feb-2007
  64. 20-Feb-2007
  65. 07-Feb-2007
  66. 19-Jan-2007
  67. 15-Jan-2007
  68. 29-Nov-2006
  69. 29-Nov-2006
  70. 09-Nov-2006
  71. 12-Oct-2006
  72. 12-Oct-2006
  73. 12-Oct-2006
  74. 11-Oct-2006
  75. 31-Aug-2006
  76. 31-Aug-2006
  77. 31-Aug-2006
  78. 31-Aug-2006
  79. 27-Jul-2006
  80. 27-Jul-2006
  81. 26-Jul-2006
  82. 26-Jul-2006
  83. 13-Jul-2006
  84. 13-Jul-2006
  85. 13-Jul-2006
  86. 13-Jul-2006
  87. 06-Jul-2006
  88. 02-Jan-2006
  89. 29-Aug-2005
  90. 25-Jul-2005
  91. 25-Jul-2005
  92. 25-Jul-2005
  93. 25-Jul-2005
  94. 25-Jul-2005
  95. 25-Jul-2005
  96. 25-Jul-2005
  97. 25-Jul-2005
  98. 09-May-2005
  99. 09-May-2005
  100. 09-May-2005
  101. 09-May-2005
  102. 09-May-2005
  103. 09-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 09-May-2005
  105. 09-May-2005
  106. 09-May-2005
  107. 07-Mar-2005
  108. 28-Feb-2005
  109. 01-Feb-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6789/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 6789/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals filed by Chandigarh Administration against the High Court's judgment (dated 26 August 2004), which had affirmed the Central Administrative Tribunal's orders directing regularization of work-charge/daily-wage employees and payment of pension and family pension benefits. Key Directions: The Court directed Chandigarh Administration to: (1) expedite regularization of respondents not yet regularized; (2) pay full salary including dearness allowance and pensionary benefits under CPWD rules to those in work-charged establishment; (3) pay pension to retired employees and family pension to widows; and (4) provide gratuity and pension benefits to already-regularized employees. The interim order dated 7 March 2005 was vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case