PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES vs U.O.I. — C.A. No. 4294/1998
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010024521998
Filing Date
10-Feb-1998
Registration No
C.A. No. 4294/1998
Diary Number
2452/1998
Order Date
06-Jan-2004
Document Type
Judgment - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES
Adv. MANIK KARANJAWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.U.O.I.
Adv. SUSHMA SURI SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL DEVENDRA SINGH MEHRA ANIL SHRIVASTAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Jan-2004
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-1998
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4294/1998
Case Summary: People's Union for Civil Liberties v. U.O.I. (CA 4294/1998) Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the government's right to withhold an Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) safety report under Section 18 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Key Reasoning: While recognizing that the right to information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), the Court held that Section 18—which permits the Central Government to restrict disclosure of sensitive nuclear information—is constitutionally valid as a reasonable restriction in the interest of state security. The Court determined that nuclear plant operations are inherently sensitive; disclosure of safety defect details could facilitate sabotage and enable hostile nations to reverse-calculate India's nuclear capabilities. The judgment balanced competing public interests (citizens' right to know vs. national security) and concluded that security concerns outweighed transparency demands in this context. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts