CHINNAMMA vs GOPALAN — C.A. No. 6227/1995

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010024331995

Filing Date

25-Feb-1995

Registration No

C.A. No. 6227/1995

Diary Number

2433/1995

Order Date

13-Oct-1995

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHINNAMMA

    Adv. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPALAN

    Adv. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Oct-1995

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Feb-1995

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6227/1995

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chinnamma v. Gopalan The Supreme Court held that under Kerala's rent control law, a tenant seeking to vacate an eviction order for non-payment of rent need only deposit the specific arrears quantified in the eviction order itself—not all rent that accrued until the date of deposit. The Court ruled that Section 11(2)(c) and Section 12 operate in different situations and should not be read together, rejecting the High Court's broader interpretation requiring payment of all arrears through the deposit date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case