V. RAJA KUMARI vs P.SUBBARAMA NAIDU — Crl.A. No. 887/1999

Case under Section II. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010024311999

Filing Date

10-Feb-1999

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 887/1999

Diary Number

2431/1999

Order Date

02-Nov-2004

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V. RAJA KUMARI

    Adv. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.SUBBARAMA NAIDU

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Nov-2004

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Feb-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 887/1999

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's decision that a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint should not be dismissed at the threshold merely because notice wasn't physically received. The Court held that "giving notice" (sending it to the correct address) differs from "receipt of notice," and if a payee dispatches a written demand notice within 15 days of learning of dishonor to the drawer's correct address, the statutory obligation is satisfied; whether the accused actually received it is a matter for trial, not grounds for preliminary dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case