DIR.,INDIAN I.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY vs DEEPTI BHARDWAJ . — C.A. No. 2432/2007

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010023822007

Filing Date

19-Jan-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 2432/2007

Diary Number

2382/2007

Order Date

09-May-2007

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIR.,INDIAN I.INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

    Adv. SHRISH KUMAR MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEEPTI BHARDWAJ .

    Adv. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2432/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DIR., Indian Information Technology v. Deepti Bhardwaj (CA No. 002432/2007) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Indian Institute of Information Technology, setting aside the High Court's order that had invalidated the employee's termination. The Court held that Deepti Bhardwaj's appointment as Hindi Officer was temporary and made without Government of India sanction, making her termination legally valid. Key Finding: The Court found that under the Institute's Memorandum of Association, all posts except the Director's position require prior Central Government approval. The Hindi Officer post was never sanctioned by the Government of India; it was created temporarily to address increased Hindi work. When the Government of India declined sanction and filed a complaint, the Director had no option but to terminate the appointment. Next Steps: The Court directed that if the Government of India subsequently sanctions the Hindi Officer post, the Institute should sympathetically consider Bhardwaj's case, recognizing her prior experience. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case