RAM LAKHAN PRASAD vs THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. STATE OF BIHAR — C.A. No. 3723/2007

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010023642006

Filing Date

23-Jan-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 3723/2007

Diary Number

2364/2006

Order Date

15-Feb-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM LAKHAN PRASAD

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. STATE OF BIHAR

    Adv. GOPAL SINGH PAREKH & CO.[R-2] PAREKH & CO.[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  4. 08-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  5. 07-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  6. 31-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  7. 24-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  8. 23-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  9. 22-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  10. 27-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 06-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3723/2007

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Appeal No. 3723/2007 The Supreme Court dismissed Ram Lakhan Prasad's appeal against the State of Bihar on February 15, 2018. The Court found that the Inspecting Judge's opinion regarding the appellant's performance contained nothing stigmatic, and his non-continuation beyond age 58 was lawful. No relief was granted, and the appeal stands dismissed with finality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case