HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. vs ASSOCIATION OF ENGG.WORKERS — C.A. No. 6410/2000

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010022772000

Filing Date

05-Feb-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 6410/2000

Diary Number

2277/2000

Order Date

14-Mar-2008

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD.

    Adv. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSOCIATION OF ENGG.WORKERS

    Adv. P. K. MANOHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2008

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 28-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Feb-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6410/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Association of Engineering Workers Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed Hindalco's appeal and upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the company committed unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court declared that 27 canteen workers were de facto employees of Hindalco despite being nominally employed through contractors, and directed the company to absorb them as permanent employees with full wages and benefits within three months. Key Reasoning: Although the canteen contract showed multiple contractors over decades, the court found that ultimate control, supervision, and financial responsibility rested with Hindalco—which provided premises, utilities, equipment, uniforms, and reimbursed all wages. The continuous employment of workers despite contractor changes, combined with the statutory obligation to maintain the canteen, established a genuine employer-employee relationship with the company, making the contractor arrangement merely a façade. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case