THE ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN vs BUILDWORTH PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI PRADIP KUMAR SINGH — C.A. No. 484/2008
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010022602007
Filing Date
19-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 484/2008
Diary Number
2260/2007
Order Date
04-Jul-2017
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 587
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
Adv. SNEHA KALITA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BUILDWORTH PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI PRADIP KUMAR SINGH
Adv. RAJIV MEHTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jul-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
20-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
05-Nov-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
05-Nov-2014
ROPView PDF
-
20-Aug-2014
Office ReportView PDF
-
20-Aug-2014
ROPView PDF
-
29-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 484/2008
-
[ 2017 INSC 587 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Assam State Electricity Board v. Buildworth Pvt. Ltd. Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the Board's appeal and allowed Buildworth's appeals. The arbitrator's awards for price escalation and idling charges were upheld. Interest was awarded from 20 April 1987 to 31 December 1997 and thereafter at 12% p.a. (reduced from the awarded 18% p.a.). Key Reasoning: The Court held that price escalation applies beyond the scheduled contract period when work extends due to circumstances beyond the contractor's control, and that arbitrators can award interest on damages under the Interest Act, 1978, even for pre-reference periods when notice is given. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts