CHATURBHUJ LAL vs BIHAR STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD . AND ORS. — C.A. No. 7203/2008
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010022222004
Filing Date
28-Jan-2004
Registration No
C.A. No. 7203/2008
Diary Number
2222/2004
Order Date
08-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHATURBHUJ LAL
Adv. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BIHAR STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD . AND ORS.
Adv. KAUSHIK PODDAR GOPAL SINGH GOPAL PRASAD KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL ALOK KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MANISH KUMAR SARAN SANJAY JAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy
-
11-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2004
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7203/2008
Summary: Civil Appeal No. 7203/2008 - Chaturbhuj Lal v. Bihar State Pollution Control Board The Supreme Court allowed Chaturbhuj Lal's appeal on 8th February 2018, setting aside the High Court Division Bench's order and restoring the Single Judge's decision. The court held that Lal, appointed in 1976, was senior to Respondent No.7 (appointed 1980) for promotion purposes, with the relevant date being 1984 when both possessed requisite qualifications. The court directed payment of all promotion benefits and consequential benefits to Lal within four months, with no recovery from the retired Respondent No.7. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts