CHATURBHUJ LAL vs BIHAR STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD . AND ORS. — C.A. No. 7203/2008

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010022222004

Filing Date

28-Jan-2004

Registration No

C.A. No. 7203/2008

Diary Number

2222/2004

Order Date

08-Feb-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHATURBHUJ LAL

    Adv. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIHAR STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD . AND ORS.

    Adv. KAUSHIK PODDAR GOPAL SINGH GOPAL PRASAD KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL ALOK KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MANISH KUMAR SARAN SANJAY JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Feb-2018

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy

  4. 11-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 13-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 15-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 28-Jan-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7203/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Civil Appeal No. 7203/2008 - Chaturbhuj Lal v. Bihar State Pollution Control Board The Supreme Court allowed Chaturbhuj Lal's appeal on 8th February 2018, setting aside the High Court Division Bench's order and restoring the Single Judge's decision. The court held that Lal, appointed in 1976, was senior to Respondent No.7 (appointed 1980) for promotion purposes, with the relevant date being 1984 when both possessed requisite qualifications. The court directed payment of all promotion benefits and consequential benefits to Lal within four months, with no recovery from the retired Respondent No.7. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case