STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. . vs DEBU LAL MAHATO AND ORS. — C.A. No. 1774/2008

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010021022007

Filing Date

17-Jan-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 1774/2008

Diary Number

2102/2007

Order Date

27-Sep-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. .

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEBU LAL MAHATO AND ORS.

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR SARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Sep-2019

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  4. 24-Oct-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Oct-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  6. 25-Jul-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Jul-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (A-J)

  8. 03-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 05-Mar-2008

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 03-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 26-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 24-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 03-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 23-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 09-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 02-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1774/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary On 27-09-2019, the Supreme Court dismissed two applications (IA 83745/2016 and IA 11322/2017) seeking party addition, impleadment, and compliance with the Court's 05-03-2008 order. The Court held the applications not maintainable, as the underlying civil appeal itself was no longer pending, and decided to terminate the protracted litigation involving land-displaced persons seeking employment—a project completed in 1966. The Court noted that continued litigation decades later constituted an abuse of process and contrary to the original rehabilitation intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case