KISAN VITHOBA AAKHADE (D) TH LRS. vs SURESH TUKARAM NERKAR — C.A. No. 720/2015
Case under Civil Law : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Matters Arising Out of Suit for Specific Performance, Declaration, Injunction, Possession or Cancellation of Deeds/documents Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010019762013
Filing Date
16-Jan-2013
Registration No
C.A. No. 720/2015
Diary Number
1976/2013
Order Date
09-Sep-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2025 INSC 1092
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KISAN VITHOBA AAKHADE (D) TH LRS.
Adv. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH TUKARAM NERKAR
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Sep-2025
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
08-Sep-2025
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria
-
20-Aug-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
08-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 720/2015
-
[ 2025 INSC 1092 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's reversal of the trial and appellate courts' rejection of the plaintiff's suit for declaration of ownership and possession of a 150 sq.m property. The Court found that the plaintiff had valid title via sale deed and that mere presence of manure and waste dumped by the 9th defendant cannot establish possession, especially when the plaintiff objected to such acts. The Court rejected the defendant's unsubstantiated claim of common use through an alleged 1974 oral partition, finding no evidence or credible connection supporting it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts