ABHIRAJ . vs MATIWAR S/O LATE SH.RUPAI(D)THRLRS — C.A. No. 7489/2004

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010017692003

Filing Date

24-Jan-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 7489/2004

Diary Number

1769/2003

Order Date

03-May-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHIRAJ .

    Adv. ABHISHEK ATREY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MATIWAR S/O LATE SH.RUPAI(D)THRLRS

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL KAMLENDRA MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 29-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-Aug-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Mar-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 16-Feb-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Nov-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Jul-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7489/2004

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 007489/2004 (Abhiraj v. Matiwar) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's judgment. The Court found the High Court failed to consider Explanation (3) to Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, which grants revisional authorities power to reappraise oral and documentary evidence. Next Steps: The case was remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal. The High Court was directed to restore the writ petition and decide it on merits within six months, considering Explanation (3), after affording the parties opportunity to be heard. No order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case