M/S. HASMUKH SHAH . vs AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION . — C.A. No. 8834/2003

Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010017212001

Filing Date

23-Jan-2001

Registration No

C.A. No. 8834/2003

Diary Number

1721/2001

Order Date

03-Nov-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. HASMUKH SHAH .

    Adv. SANJAY KAPUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION .

    Adv. MANIK KARANJAWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 14-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 31-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Sep-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 06-May-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 11-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Feb-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Jan-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 21-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Jan-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8834/2003

casestatus.in Summary

On 3 November 2011, the Supreme Court dismissed C.A. No. 8834/2003 filed by M/S. Hasmukh Shah against Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. The Court found the appeal had been rendered infructuous as the main writ petition it concerned had already been decided by the High Court of Gujarat, with that decision being challenged in a separate appeal before the Supreme Court. The dismissal was ordered with no order as to costs. Related appeals C.A. Nos. 8835-8840/2003 were adjourned for hearing after two months at the parties' request due to subsequent developments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case