M.R. SIDDIQUI vs STATE OF U.P. . — C.A. No. 2244/2005
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010016442005
Filing Date
19-Jan-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 2244/2005
Diary Number
1644/2005
Order Date
03-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.R. SIDDIQUI
Adv. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. .
Adv. M. R. SHAMSHAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2244/2005
Summary of C.A. No. 002244/2005 (M.R. Siddiqui v. State of U.P.) Additional District Judge M.R. Siddiqui challenged his 2002 reversion order after an inquiry found him guilty of misconduct for allegedly granting a decree with extraneous consideration. The Allahabad High Court quashed the reversion but denied him emoluments for the reversion period. The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals on April 3, 2014, affirming that the two charges were interconnected and holding the High Court's decision denying emoluments was justified. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts