STATE OF KERALA . vs MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD. . — C.A. No. 2249 - 2257/2000

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010015682000

Filing Date

25-Jan-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 2249 - 2257/2000

Diary Number

1568/2000

Order Date

06-May-2005

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KERALA .

    Adv. K. R. SASIPRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD. .

    Adv. E. M. S. ANAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Oct-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Jul-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Jan-2004
  7. 05-Dec-2003
  8. 06-Oct-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Sep-2003
  10. 12-Sep-2003
  11. 25-Aug-2003
  12. 11-Aug-2003
  13. 28-Jul-2003
  14. 28-Apr-2003
  15. 31-Mar-2003
  16. 03-Mar-2003
  17. 03-Feb-2003
  18. 27-Jan-2003
  19. 07-Jan-2003
  20. 19-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 10-Oct-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 25-Jan-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2249 - 2257/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State of Kerala v. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. (C.A. No. 002249-002257/2000) Court's Decision: The Supreme Court held that excise duty paid by Kerala State Beverages Corporation (KSBC) on Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) manufactured by distillers must be included in the distillers' turnover for sales tax purposes, but only from January 5, 1999 onwards—when rules were amended requiring KSBC to pay duty before purchasing liquor from manufacturers. Key Reasoning: The Court found that the levy under Kerala's Abkari Act was not strictly excise duty on manufacture, but rather a "privilege price" paid by KSBC for the State's exclusive wholesale monopoly. Before January 5, 1999, manufacturers were correctly excluded from paying this. However, post-amendment, when KSBC paid duty directly to manufacturers as part of the purchase consideration, such amounts became part of manufacturers' taxable turnover and remained includable even under the subsequently amended Section 5(2C) of the Sales Tax Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case