RAJIV LOCHAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs HARI NANDAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. . — SLP(C) No. 4945/2006

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010015302006

Filing Date

14-Jan-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 4945/2006

Diary Number

1530/2006

Order Date

15-Mar-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV LOCHAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

    Adv. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARI NANDAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. .

    Adv. D. MAHESH BABU NAVNEET CHAUDHARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 23-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 22-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 15-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 14-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 13-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 4945/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 004945/2006 On 15/03/2013, the Supreme Court heard the special leave petition concerning disputed land and disposed of the matter by settlement. The parties agreed that 70% of the disputed land would be mutated in favor of the legal representatives of deceased petitioner Rajiv Lochan and Respondents 3-5, while 30% would go to the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 1 (Hari Nandan). The Court directed that the mutation be effected accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case