RIVIERA APARTMENTS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR INDER P. CHOUDHRIE vs NCT OF DELHI THROUGH LT. GOVERNOR — C.A. No. 439 - 440/2009
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010014732007
Filing Date
11-Jan-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 439 - 440/2009
Diary Number
1473/2007
Order Date
22-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RIVIERA APARTMENTS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR INDER P. CHOUDHRIE
Adv. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.NCT OF DELHI THROUGH LT. GOVERNOR
Adv. SAHARYA & CO. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1] ANIL KATIYAR[R-2] ANIL KATIYAR[R-3] ANIL KATIYAR[R-5] ANIL KATIYAR[R-6]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
26-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
26-Oct-2017
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
20-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 439 - 440/2009
Case Summary: On 22 February 2018, the Supreme Court disposed of Civil Appeals No. 439-440/2009 filed by Riviera Apartments Pvt. Ltd. against NCT of Delhi as infructuous. The court noted that appellant no. 2 had passed away and that a limited notice had been previously issued regarding fraud and suppression observations against that appellant. Since appellant no. 2's death meant the cause of action no longer survived, the appeals were terminated without substantive adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts