RAJIV DAWAR vs THE STATE OF DELHI HIGH COURT OF DELHI REGISTRAR GENERAL — Crl.A. No. 51/2007

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010014592007

Filing Date

11-Jan-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 51/2007

Diary Number

1459/2007

Order Date

26-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 672

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV DAWAR

    Adv. ASHOK MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF DELHI HIGH COURT OF DELHI REGISTRAR GENERAL

    Adv. C. K. SUCHARITA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Jul-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 26-Jul-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  5. 19-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 25-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 51/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajiv Dawar v. High Court of Delhi (Crl.A. 51/2007) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on lawyer Rajiv Dawar for contempt of court. He had been fined Rs. 2,000 and suspended from legal practice for two months by the High Court of Delhi. Key Reasoning: The Court found critical procedural violations—the appellant was denied opportunity to adduce evidence or cross-examine the complainant (an NDPS Act accused). The Bar Council of Delhi had previously absolved Dawar of misconduct, characterizing the matter as withdrawal from a case requiring partial fee refund (Rs. 4 lakhs), not criminal contempt. The conviction could not stand based solely on unproven allegations. Next Steps: All pending applications disposed of; judgment dated 26 July 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case