SHRIGOWDA TALUKA SHAKHAR K. UNION . vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . — C.A. No. 462/2008
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010014582006
Filing Date
13-Jan-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 462/2008
Diary Number
1458/2006
Order Date
24-Aug-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIGOWDA TALUKA SHAKHAR K. UNION .
Adv. T. V. GEORGE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PAREKH & CO. J S WAD AND CO ASHA GOPALAN NAIR GOPAL BALWANT SATHE CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI SHIVAJI M. JADHAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jun-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jun-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jun-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 462/2008
Case Summary: C.A. No. 462/2008 On 24 August 2011, the Supreme Court heard arguments in this civil appeal by Shrigowda Taluka Shakhar K. Union challenging the State of Maharashtra, involving requests to quash proceedings and obtain permission to sell scheduled lands in Thane District. The appellant's counsel Mr. T.V. George commenced arguments at 12:30 p.m. but could not complete them before the court adjourned for the day, leaving the matter part-heard. The court directed that the case be relisted on 30 August 2011 as part-heard on top of the board for continuation of arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts