THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY vs CHAMKAUR SINGH — Crl.A. No. 217/2008

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010014512007

Filing Date

11-Jan-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 217/2008

Diary Number

1451/2007

Order Date

14-Feb-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

    Adv. JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAMKAUR SINGH

    Adv. M. K. GARG[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  3. 31-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  4. 17-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  5. 16-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  6. 15-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  7. 20-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  9. 04-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2008
  11. 22-Oct-2008
  12. 03-Oct-2008
  13. 01-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 11-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 217/2008

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: Crl.A. No. 216/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 217/2008: On 04/08/2011, the Supreme Court's Registrar heard Crl.A. No. 217/2008 (State of Punjab v. Chamkaur Singh), which was consolidated with Crl.A. No. 216/2008 as the parties and records were identical. Both sides agreed no pre-hearing steps were required. The Court directed the matter be listed before the Hon'ble Court for substantive hearing as per Rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case