THEERADESHA VIKASANA SAMITHI vs UNION OF INDIA . — SLP(C) No. 3774/2002
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010014232002
Filing Date
17-Jan-2002
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 3774/2002
Diary Number
1423/2002
Order Date
09-Aug-2010
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THEERADESHA VIKASANA SAMITHI
Adv. P. I. JOSE
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR G. PRAKASH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jul-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2003
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
18-Mar-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2002
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jan-2002
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 3774/2002
Summary of SLP(C) No. 3774/2002 On 09/08/2010, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition challenging coastal zone management policies. The Court accepted the Government's counter-affidavit showing progress on coastal regulation reforms, including a pre-draft Coastal Regulation Zone Notification 2010 incorporating Swaminathan Committee recommendations and special provisions for Kerala. The Court permitted petitioners to file suggestions/objections within 60 days of the draft notification's publication, after which the final notification would be issued expeditiously. Related petitions SLP(C) Nos. 5270 and 6187/2002 were similarly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts