JGS KISHORE KUMAR vs RAVI AGARWAL — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 72/2026
Case under Service Laws : Promotion, Seniority, Payment of Salary, Bonus, Provident Fund, Service Benefits, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Pay Scales, Transfer Section X. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010014192026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
CONMT.PET.(C) No. 72/2026
Diary Number
1419/2026
Order Date
25-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JGS KISHORE KUMAR
Adv. SUSHIL BALWADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVI AGARWAL
Case History
-
25-May-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
13-Feb-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 72/2026
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 700/2017
Summary: The Supreme Court heard a contempt petition (CONMT.PET.(C) No. 72/2026) by JGS Kishore Kumar against Ravi Agarwal on 13-02-2026. The Court found that the case was improperly listed before it, as a coordinate Bench had already passed an order on 28-01-2026 and remained available. The Court directed the Registry to examine why the case was listed before this Bench and to take steps for relisting the matter before the appropriate Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts