NARAYANAGOWDA . vs A.B. NANJAPPA 'DEAD' — C.A. No. 334/2003

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010013792002

Filing Date

17-Jan-2002

Registration No

C.A. No. 334/2003

Diary Number

1379/2002

Order Date

06-Sep-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYANAGOWDA .

    Adv. ADARSH UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.B. NANJAPPA 'DEAD'

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 22-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 22-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 10-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 14-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 19-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Jan-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Oct-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 26-Aug-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Jul-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Apr-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 04-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 17-Jan-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 334/2003

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY In this Karnataka land reforms case, the Supreme Court allowed Narayanagowda's appeal against the High Court's October 2001 judgment. The dispute involved competing claims to agricultural land under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Land Tribunal and Land Reforms Appellate Authority had found that respondents' predecessors manipulated revenue records only for 1972-75 and lacked possession on the statutory cut-off date (March 1, 1974), rejecting their tenant claim. However, the High Court reversed these findings based on presumption alone, without explaining its legal basis. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order on September 6, 2012, finding the reversal unsustainable and restoring the lower authorities' factual findings. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case