M/S. D.D. INDUSTRIES LTD. DIRECTOR vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI — C.A. No. 583/2010
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010013692010
Filing Date
13-Jan-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 583/2010
Diary Number
1369/2010
Order Date
01-Mar-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. D.D. INDUSTRIES LTD. DIRECTOR
Adv. M. P. VINOD
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Mar-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
23-Feb-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
22-Feb-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
09-Feb-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
08-Feb-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta
-
17-Aug-2022
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar
-
06-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
04-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
09-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - IV
-
09-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Registrar (A-J)
-
24-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 583/2010
Case Summary: D.D. Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi (CA 583/2010) The Supreme Court dismissed D.D. Industries' appeal challenging the valuation of customized motor vehicle parts for central excise purposes. The court upheld the lower authority's finding that goods' valuation under Section 4(1) should be based on the discounted price sold to related party M/s D.D. Sales Corporation, rejecting the assessee's argument that export sales to M/s Eastern Auto Industries (Nepal) should be the applicable basis. The Court found the concurrent findings on valuation correct and required no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts