M/S TATA MOTORS LTD. vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT THROUGH THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER — C.A. No. 5299 - 5304/2003
Case under Section XVII-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010013342003
Filing Date
20-Jan-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 5299 - 5304/2003
Diary Number
1334/2003
Order Date
14-Dec-2018
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2018 INSC 1204
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S TATA MOTORS LTD.
Adv. RAJAN NARAIN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT THROUGH THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
Fixed Date by Court
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
After Week/Month/Vacation
After Week/Month/Vacation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-Dec-2018 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 28-Nov-2018 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 24-Oct-2018 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 10-May-2018 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 09-May-2018 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
Orders
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 6 of the Bihar Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1994, which imposes tax on manufacturers and dealers possessing vehicles suitable for road use during their business operations. The Court rejected arguments that the amendment to the central Motor Vehicles Act (removing manufacturers from the dealer definition) affected the state tax law, holding that both acts operate in different legislative fields. Additionally, the Court upheld the imposition of penalties for delayed tax payment under Section 23, finding that statutory penalties apply automatically for non-payment within prescribed periods and the appellants' good-faith challenge to the law's validity did not exempt them from penalties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts