MANMATHA NATH GHOSH . vs BAIDYANATH MUKHERJEE . — C.A. No. 1449/2000

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010012962000

Filing Date

20-Jan-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 1449/2000

Diary Number

1296/2000

Order Date

26-Apr-2005

Document Type

Judgment - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANMATHA NATH GHOSH .

    Adv. SUMITA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAIDYANATH MUKHERJEE .

    Adv. RAJAN NARAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Apr-2005

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Jan-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 14-Dec-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 10-Dec-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Jan-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1449/2000

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by Recording Officers of Calcutta High Court's Original Side seeking pay parity with Assistant Registrars on the Appellate Side. The Court upheld the 1973 Full Court Resolution that differentiated the two categories despite identical designations, holding that the High Court's assessment of work equivalence was not judicially reviewable and that pay scale determinations were executive functions, not subject to judicial intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case