TARA CHAND SACHDEVA vs ROHINI KUMARI . — C.A. No. 313/2004

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010012342002

Filing Date

15-Jan-2002

Registration No

C.A. No. 313/2004

Diary Number

1234/2002

Order Date

16-Jan-2004

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARA CHAND SACHDEVA

    Adv. INDRA SAWHNEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHINI KUMARI .

    Adv. ANUPAM LAL DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Mar-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Feb-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Nov-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Jul-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Mar-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Jan-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 313/2004

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Civil Appeal No. 313/2004 (Tara Chand Sachdeva v. Rohini Kumari) The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's in limine dismissal of the appellant's statutory appeal in a Workmen Compensation Act case arising from a 1985 incident. The Court found that despite a six-year delay in filing the claim petition (condoned by the tribunal), the High Court should have given the appeal deeper consideration rather than dismissing it summarily, particularly given a 1992 criminal acquittal order of which respondents were aware. The Court remitted the matter to the High Court for fresh decision on merits with expeditious hearing, directing that 50% of the appellant's deposited amount be paid to the deceased workman's legal representatives pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case