CHANDRASEKAR . vs STATE — Crl.A. No. 1345/2012
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010010922011
Filing Date
07-Jan-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1345/2012
Diary Number
1092/2011
Order Date
22-May-2017
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 465
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRASEKAR .
Adv. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I DEEPAK ANAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. M. YOGESH KANNA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-May-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
22-May-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
16-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
08-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2013
Office ReportView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1345/2012
Summary of Chandrasekar v. State (Crl.A. No. 1345/2012) The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants Chandrasekar, Balasubramanian, and Govindaraj under IPC Section 302 for the brutal murder of Gnanasekaran on July 17, 2007. The three appellants attacked the victim repeatedly on the head with a hammer, sickle, and iron rod respectively, causing multiple grave head injuries that resulted in death. The court found the eyewitness testimony of the injured witness (PW-1 Lalbahadur Sastri) highly credible, as injured witnesses have inherent reliability, and corroborated evidence from two additional eyewitnesses established the appellants' individual murderous intent. The motive was clear: anger over the victim's acquittal in a criminal case the previous day. The appeals were dismissed and bail bonds cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts