MOHAN LAL vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB STATE OF PUNJAB SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1880/2011

Case under Section II-B. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010752010

Filing Date

11-Jan-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1880/2011

Diary Number

1075/2010

Order Date

16-Aug-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2018 INSC 714

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN LAL

    Adv. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB STATE OF PUNJAB SECRETARY

    Adv. JASPREET GOGIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Aug-2018

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  5. 02-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-Aug-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  7. 01-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 13-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 28-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 11-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1880/2011

  20. [ 2018 INSC 714 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

On 16-08-2018, the Supreme Court allowed Mohan Lal's criminal appeal against The State of Punjab. A three-judge bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi, and Navin Sinha pronounced judgment in favor of the appellant in terms of the signed reportable judgment. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case