GLOBAL ISPAT P.LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR AJAY KUMAR vs THE STATE OF GOA STATE OF GOA AND ORS. THR. CHIEF SECRETARY — C.A. No. 2031 - 2032/2012
Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010010402012
Filing Date
07-Jan-2012
Registration No
C.A. No. 2031 - 2032/2012
Diary Number
1040/2012
Order Date
14-Feb-2025
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Last updated 22-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GLOBAL ISPAT P.LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR AJAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GOA STATE OF GOA AND ORS. THR. CHIEF SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2017
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2017
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2031 - 2032/2012
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
[ 2025 INSC 217 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 2027 - 2028/2012
SUMMARY The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals filed by five steel and alloy manufacturing companies (Global Ispat, Puja Ferro Alloys, Karthik Alloys, Karthik Inductions, and Sunrise Electromelt) challenging demand notices from Goa for recovery of electricity tariff rebates. The Court held that the companies were not entitled to the 25% rebate under the 1991 notification since they received power connections after March 31, 1995, when the rebate scheme was rescinded, and the subsequent amendments (1996-1998) were declared void. The Court applied res judicata principles, binding the companies to an earlier High Court judgment (GR Ispat) and rejected their promissory estoppel argument, holding that public interest regarding Goa's financial constraints justified withdrawal of the rebates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts