NEW MEDIA BROADCASTING P.LTD . vs UNION OF INDIA — C.A. No. 2309/2010

Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010212010

Filing Date

11-Jan-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 2309/2010

Diary Number

1021/2010

Order Date

12-Feb-2015

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEW MEDIA BROADCASTING P.LTD .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Feb-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 20-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Nov-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Oct-2014
  12. 15-Oct-2014
  13. 08-Sep-2014
  14. 08-Sep-2014
  15. 14-Aug-2014
  16. 30-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Mar-2014
  18. 24-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 30-Sep-2013
  20. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 19-Jul-2013
  22. 16-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 31-Jan-2013
  24. 24-Sep-2012
  25. 19-Sep-2012
  26. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 04-May-2011
  28. 30-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 30-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 16-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Jul-2010
  33. 08-Jul-2010
  34. 13-May-2010
  35. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 17-Mar-2010
  37. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 11-Jan-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2309/2010

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court admitted the SLPs filed by Union of India against Vertex Broadcasting Co., condoning the filing delay and granting leave. Permission to file additional documents was also granted. The Court directed that if the respondents ultimately succeed, any amount paid would be refunded with interest, and ordered the hearing to be expedited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case