AMARENDU JYOTI . vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH . — Crl.A. No. 546/2009

Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010010032007

Filing Date

08-Jan-2007

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 546/2009

Diary Number

1003/2007

Order Date

04-Aug-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARENDU JYOTI .

    Adv. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHATTISGARH .

    Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 31-Jul-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 26-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 546/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Amarendu Jyoti v. State of Chhattisgarh (Crl.A. 546/2009) The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court's decision on territorial jurisdiction. The Court held that the cruelty offense under IPC Section 498-A was not a "continuing offense" and that all alleged incidents occurred in Delhi during the couple's brief cohabitation (April-May 2003), not at Ambikapur. Therefore, Delhi court had proper jurisdiction, not Ambikapur. However, in the interest of justice under Article 142, the Court permitted the Ambikapur court to proceed with the trial of the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case