AMARENDU JYOTI . vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH . — Crl.A. No. 546/2009
Case under Section II-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010010032007
Filing Date
08-Jan-2007
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 546/2009
Diary Number
1003/2007
Order Date
04-Aug-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMARENDU JYOTI .
Adv. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHATTISGARH .
Adv. NIRAJ SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2013
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2007
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 546/2009
Summary of Amarendu Jyoti v. State of Chhattisgarh (Crl.A. 546/2009) The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court's decision on territorial jurisdiction. The Court held that the cruelty offense under IPC Section 498-A was not a "continuing offense" and that all alleged incidents occurred in Delhi during the couple's brief cohabitation (April-May 2003), not at Ambikapur. Therefore, Delhi court had proper jurisdiction, not Ambikapur. However, in the interest of justice under Article 142, the Court permitted the Ambikapur court to proceed with the trial of the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts