KRISHNA KUMAR . vs LALUSHAH . — C.A. No. 3198/2008

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010009742005

Filing Date

11-Jan-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 3198/2008

Diary Number

974/2005

Order Date

07-Sep-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA KUMAR .

    Adv. PRASHANT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALUSHAH .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Sep-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  4. 06-Sep-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  5. 05-Sep-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  6. 31-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Nov-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 02-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 20-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-May-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-Jan-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3198/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Krishna Kumar v. Lalushah (C.A. No. 003198/2008) The Supreme Court allowed Krishna Kumar's appeal on 7 September 2017, restoring the trial court's decree and dismissing the respondent's suit. The dispute concerned whether widow Umedibai had authority to sell property (via deed dated 2 June 1978) when she held only a life interest under her deceased husband's 1973 will. The Court found merit in appellants' contention that under Hindu law, a widow's pre-existing maintenance right from joint family property elevated her limited estate to full ownership, citing precedent. The respondents did not appear despite service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case